hoax http://news.absurd.services/taxonomy/term/626/all en Viewership http://news.absurd.services/viewership <div class="field field-type-nodereference field-field-reference"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> <a href="/prayas-abhinav">Prayas Abhinav</a> </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-datestamp field-field-date"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> <span class="date-display-single">Sunday, 9. June 2013 (All day)</span> </div> </div> </div> <fieldset class="fieldgroup group-photos"><div class="field field-type-filefield field-field-photos"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> <img class="imagefield imagefield-field_photos" width="960" height="591" title="image" alt="image" src="http://news.absurd.services/sites/default/files/image.jpg?1370748311" /> </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-number-integer field-field-num-images"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> 1 </div> </div> </div> </fieldset> <p>In this text I discuss viewing as a process and although it relates to usership it&#39;s not about using but viewing. It&#39;s not <a href="/paid-usership">Paid Usership </a>however yet it relates to it the French filmmaker Jean-Luc Godard and his statement in <em>Six fois deux</em> that all viewers should be paid to watch television. This text is not about one-directional TV viewing, rather viewership here is describing two modes of visually engaging with cinema and then offers ways to account for the unpaid labour of visual engagement.</p> <p><a href="http://news.absurd.services/viewership" target="_blank">read more</a></p> hoax Sun, 09 Jun 2013 03:14:03 +0000 Prayas Abhinav 2218 at http://news.absurd.services